Quantcast
Channel: THIS & THAT
Viewing all 126 articles
Browse latest View live

Tandav

$
0
0

(Spoiler alert. Also, a helpful forewarning on sentiment-hurting moments) 




For a guy who was so out of the accepted Bollywood star template, Saif Ali Khan has had a very interesting career graph. Back during the embarrassing days of the likes of Tu Khiladi Mai Anari etc., his life span in the film industry looked very short.  But everyone underestimated his ability to reinvent and work on himself –  if as Sameer in Dil Chahta Hai he proved his bankability, as Langda Tyagi in Omkara he showed his middle finger to all who had written him off as an actor.  Reinvention is a constant process –  Saif has sort of figured out the formula to break away from the mould and take risks, whilst remaining commercially relevant. Unlike his peers, over the years he has increasingly experimented with greyer roles, and so I had high expectations for Tandav. I admit, I did feel underwhelmed by the end of the first season. (Now, if you want to watch this series to see how much it hurts your sentiments, I've left helpful hints in colour fonts.)

Unfortunately, Tandav immerses itself in all the predictable clichés from the get go – protests; politically woke students (of course the Muslim students are “encountered” or hauled away as terrorists), smarmy and corrupt Dilli police officers, power-hungry politicians...the works. Even so, the first episode held the promise of a tight thriller, what with a dapper Samar Pratap Singh (Saif) bumping off his old man who is also the PM (Tigmanshu Dhulia) so he can ascend the throne. Now, here’s my pet peeve – a premeditated murder is in progress and the perpetrator engages in this soliloquy (presumably for the benefit of the stupid audience) whereby he explains why and how he’s committing the murder. This nonsense really deflates the intensity of a scene and it becomes difficult to take the perpetrator seriously. If you are into crime genre, this is where your sentiments begin to hurt. 

Subsequently, like noodles loosening in hot water, the plot unravels – for one, there’s the mysterious guy in a hoodie sitting in front of a bank of monitors (so you know he’s a hacker-type, and therefore your sentiments as crime genre lover are hurt again) who knows the truth about the PM’s death. He gives this information to Samar’s bete noire Anuradha Kishore (Dimple Kapadia) (some unbelievable rummage-the-rubbish bins-for-clues stuff goes on here - cue - hurt sentiments), his father’s lover and party president, in exchange for money.  With some nifty blackmailing, Anuradha snatches away the PM’s chair right from under Samar’s impressive nose. After much breaking of decanters and whiskey glasses and chandeliers (hurt sentiments ), Samar decides he is better off as a kingmaker. His target is a particularly angry student, Shiva (Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub). For some inexplicable reason, Samar feels the only way to bring Shiva under his fold is by bumping off the kid’s “commie” friends – and so by the end of the first season, students are dropping dead like flies sprayed with baygon spray (hurt sentiments ).

Despite the plot resembling a hairball, the series is quite watchable solely because of the actors. I wish they’d gone for more of a slowburn and allowed the characters to develop. It was heartening to see Dimple in a very self-aware, shrewd, power grabber role. This is the beauty of OTT opportunities -  regular run-of-the-mill film scripts rarely write roles for older women, except as mother-figures.

As the suave antagonist Saif skulks and prowls, measures his words, modulates his tone, but his role is completely let down with the lack of a character arc – we know Samar is bad news but even 9 episodes later, we really take don’t him seriously. I mean if your only answer to all problems is to bump off people, then it gets rather tedious (hurt sentiments). There are a few understated scenes where Saif’s gaze below an impressive frown burns through, but these are few. We are thrown morsels of insights into Samar’s character, just not enough to make us connect at any emotional level. There is a hint of a complicated partners-in-crime relationship with his wife Ayesha (Sarah-Jane Dias) but again, you couldn’t care. For one, those excellent cheekbones notwithstanding, Sarah’s role is reduced to throwing Ex-Machina stares at everyone  (hurt sentiments). You wonder if it’s because she’s hungry or angry or ill…and somewhere in the last episode, you figure it’s probably because of sexual dissatisfaction with the unfaithful Samar…but at this point Ayesha’s character has become irrelevant.

Mohammed Zeeshan plays Shiva’s role to perfection as the naïve idealist student angry at the world. The stage is set for the conflict between Samar and Shiva in subsequent seasons – the older jackal versus the inexperienced cub. If the writers play their cards right and decide to focus on fleshing out the characters rather than episodic twists, Season 2 will be interesting.

Season 1 definitely belongs to one person only – Sunil Grover – he oozes menace and creepiness in his silent and still portrayal of Gurpal, Samar’s Oddjob of sorts.

Even if you don’t enjoy the story itself, Tandav is an easy watch for its top notch production quality. The women are swathed in some utterly gorgeous collection of sarees with perfectly tailored blouses and accessories; there’s Saif’s immaculate kurtas and waistcoats; and there’s Grover’s pretty cool tinted retro glasses.

Coming to the most important question …

Whenever there was a closeup of Saif’s face, I admit my sentiments were (mildly) hurt…as a woman who battles melasma off and on, that glowing skin is too much to tolerate. Also, I was outraged that yet again this is another series with a bevy of thin, fair women. One day those of us with higher BMIs will rise in rebellion…as soon as all the chevda mix in the world is over, I promise.   

© Sumana Khan 2021

 

 

 


KJo in Wonderland

$
0
0
ADHM was a good break from the daily drudgery. Great music, great aesthetics. In KJo’s world, there is no ugliness – no angry police officers, no beefed up middle-aged men, no hordes of demented villains. There is no growing up either. And that’s what is refreshing. Of course there is the usual caveat – don’t go looking for a cerebral experience.

In this movie, as a part of the ugliness hataotheme, everyone is kind of super rich and live on their own in designer apartments and townhouses in London. This removes the need for pesky parents and other annoying relatives who might distort this beautiful fantasy life. Also, the characters don’t have to worry about EMIs or plan their retirement or fret about the high tax bands in UK. They can focus on the affairs of the heart entirely - getting their hearts broken/mended/broken again in infinite cycles. Indeed none of the characters hold a day job; no complications of stressful bosses, wicked colleagues, and office politics mar this beautiful world. The daily irritations of getting squashed in the tube etc are removed with one stroke. Ranbir and Anushka’s characters are funded by their wealthy parents, while Aishwarya is presumably funded by a great divorce settlement.

Ranbir is an MBA student  (who actually wants to be a singer), who has a private jet to fly around. Anushka is a poet/writer or something (I may have misunderstood) but we never see her put pen to paper. Aishwarya too is a published poetess. Only, unlike in the real world, where poets are the most neglected lot in the publishing world,  Aishwarya is able to give away  thick hardbound copies. Her success is also evident in her wardrobe, her sighs, hushed tones, conversations in Urdu couplets, and of course, her ultra posh home – not sure if that was in Vienna or London...I lost track. 

Everyone is beautiful with glowing skins, perfect BMIs and impeccable, porcelain veneer dentistry. Not a patch of dark skin or out-of-proportion body in sight. They are always perfectly turned out in designer clothes, matching makeup, boots and handbags irrespective of the status of the heart. Their designer homes are stuffed with crystal knick knacks that, in real life, you would only window-shop in John Lewis or Harrods. Not a question of affordability, but who can spend hours dusting, really?  And those damned misshapen Arabian vases and lanterns will surely break anyway. KJo puts his characters in sprawling homes in London. You can’t help but wish wistfully. In reality, shoe boxes are disguised as apartments where you have to rest your feet in the kitchen cabinet when you lie on your bed. Reality sucks. KJo creates a world of mellow lighting, cosy fire places, Egyptian cotton and silk sheets that are crisply ironed (okay, what else do you think a homemaker will notice?), and automated blinds.

What’s the story you ask? If you really must know, it is this: A loves B, but B friend-zones A. B loves C, breaks up, makes up, marries, breaks up with C. D loves A but in a pre-emptive strike, friend-zones him because A can never love D the way he loves B. D has also friend-zoned E, her ex-husband. You sort of have a new-found respect for KJo – making a movie out of that set of equations, and keeping it sparkling for at least half the movie – that’s awesome.  

In general, in this beautiful world, all that the characters have to do is go to the disco, and do other unholy things which are haram like drinking alcohol and having (and enjoying) sex.  Also, in this beautiful world, everyone is of course very nice to everyone else. And, so mature. I mean, sure, Ranbir cries more than Nirupa Roy and Pandari Bai put together, but still. Like...in real life, in an airport lounge, if a slightly sozzled young man approaches a lady minding her own business and tries to strike up an uninspiring conversation, in the worst case, his mug shot will be plastered all over social media. Or, the lady would have “alerted the authorities”. Not in KJo’s beautiful world.  No, none of this ugliness takes place. The lady simply leans forward and declares she sees a lot of pain the eyes of this doofus and encourages him to let the boohoos out. Next thing you know, they are hooked up and doing the hanky panky in public places.

There is no ugly friction between past and present relationships either.  The ex-husband is so kind and polite to ex-wife’s current boyfriend, he even indirectly compliments the toyboy’s sex life with ex-wife.  

Ranbir and Anushka have done a really good job despite limitations in the plot-less script that keeps their characters fairly one dimensional. Ranbir’s interpretation of a guy who simply can’t get over a girl is refreshing. He shows the right amount of angst when allowed by the script. There’s no vulgarity – either in dialogues or in the form of narcissistic violence, and more importantly, no item numbers. Of course, if it were me, I would have ended the movie an hour earlier. Maybe I would have even gone as far as hooking up Anushka with Aishwarya, just to make things really mushkil...and sort of bring in diversity in the whole scheme of things.

If you are afraid the movie might taint your patriotism, fikar karo not. The gentleman from the neighbouring country has a fleeting role and in the few frames where he does appear, between his luxurious mane and ferocious outbreak of facial hair, you can hardly register a glimpse. 

Considering the ugliness that constantly invades our lives via TV, news and social media – ADHM’s fantasy world is poultice. The music and lyrics are wonderful. If not anything, it gives you plenty of ideas to go wardrobe shopping.    

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ll get back to my grimy world of lime scale, oily T-zones, and less-than-pretty friends.


© Sumana Khan - 2016

The Hungry Ghost

$
0
0

Courtesy: Cover of Chandamama January 1963 edition
You are never old enough to listen to stories from your parents...I mean "bedtime" type stories :) Why do we grow out of this habit? I think more and more people should spend time telling stories - there'll be less anger :) My long vacation in India was a throwback to idyllic summer holidays. Hot, still afternoons and a good story in your hand. This time, my dad, who is an avid collector of old editions of all sorts of books, chose to narrate stories from Chandamama. He would read out as I went went about pottering in the kitchen, and time would stop, at least for me. In many ways, this was therapeutic - there is so much rage and negativity flying around in all the newspapers these days; everybody seems to be baying for blood...and the TV channels...crass, third-rate programs and "news" ...what are we doing to ourselves? 

Anyway, this particular story had me in splits...and I consumed more sajjappas from the nearby Venkateshwara Iyengar Bakery. It is from a 1963 edition of Chandamana! 

The Hungry Ghost
By B.Baburao

Courtesy: Chandamana January 1963 edition

The King of Chitrapur was in deep sleep with his mouth wide open. A mischievous pishachi (ghost) that was floating by entered his mouth and took up comfortable residence inside the King.  The next day, the King woke up feeling ravenously hungry. The royal cooks prepared the usual breakfast for him, but it did not satiate his strange hunger. The cooks were taken aback by the King’s behaviour, but scurried around to cook some more...and more. Finally, after having eaten breakfast fit for twenty people, the King seemed satisfied.

Now the cooks got ready for the usual lunch-time serving. The menu required four lambs, twelve chicken, one vegetable dish, ten ser (each ser is almost a kilo; 933.1 grams to be accurate) cooked rice. The King ate all of this by himself. Now it was clear, something was wrong with the King. The ministers and scholars of the court discussed this problem of the King’s hunger. They called in the royal doctors. But nothing was found wrong with him – even in appearance, the King did not look like one afflicted by any disease.

The King’s hunger created a great problem now. The royal kitchen could not keep up – so the cooks began to literally loot farmers of the kingdom for stocking up. There was threat of civil rebellion in the kingdom. Alarmed by the situation, and also feeling sorry for the trouble he is causing, the King decided that instead of burdening only his kitchen, he would now impose himself on his feudal lords. He would take turns and visit each of these samanthas , perhaps stay with them for a week, or fortnight...or even a month. Now, whenever the King announced his visit, hearts would start pounding.

Sabhapati was an intelligent brahmachari (bachelor), who had just finished his education in Kashi. He was well-versed in all the shastras and had won accolades from all the great scholars and pundits. Having triumphantly completed his education, he was on his way back to Chitrapur. He decided to lodge in one of the samantha’s homes for the night.

The arrival of Sabhapati created a flutter amongst the surrounding villages of Chitrapur. People from near and far flocked the samantha’s home to get a glimpse of this young, accomplished man. A social gathering of scholars and public took place only to hear Sabhapati. He mesmerised the crowd with many strange stories from his travels. He made them roar with laughter with his jokes. Indeed people felt their stomachs will become sore – they enjoyed his jokes so much. But Sabhapati noticed only the samantharemained grim.  Upon enquiring, the samantha described his royal problem – the King was arriving as a guest, and what this means.

Sabhapati heard the story and thought for a while. Then he said, ‘Samantha, I will solve this problem. But the condition is you must do as I say. No questions asked.’ The samantha  agreed.

That evening, the King came with his royal family. Even as his foot crossed the threshold, he started bellowing, ‘Bring my snacks! Bring my snacks!’

A maNe (low wooden stool, used for sitting cross-legged on the floor) was kept only for the King and all the savouries and sweets were brought out. The King, forgetting all decorum, started gobbling up the food. Sabhapati sat near the King, chewing on a blade of grass.
The King noticed Sabhapati and said, ‘Have you gone mad? You are eating grass like cattle.’

‘Not at all Your Highness,’ Sabhapati replied politely. ‘It is not decorum for you sit alone isn’t it? That is why I am giving you company.’

The King was now embarrassed. He kept a fruit on a plate and pushed it towards Sabhapati. Sabhapati nonchalantly started peeling the fruit. He said, ‘I have a request for you, if you don’t mind.’

‘Go ahead.’

‘I request you to please sleep for a while before you sit down for dinner.’

‘Yes. Anyway I was thinking of sleeping for an hour or so. So your request is granted.’

As soon as the King fell asleep, Sabhapati tied up his legs and hands. Everyone waited for the King to wake up. The King stirred after two or three hours. As usual, as soon as he woke up, a ravenous hunger attacked him. He was flummoxed to see his hands and legs were tied.

Meanwhile, Sabhapati asked the cook to bring in all the aromatic dishes. Upon getting the aroma and seeing the dishes, the King’s mouth started watering. But Sabhapati seemed unmindful of the King’s hunger. He sat near the king and arranged the food in front of himself. Then, he began talking.

‘I want to tell you a strange story, dear King. I heard this from a Siddha (yogi). Protected by the towering peaks of the Himalayas, there is a beautiful valley. In that valley, there is an extraordinary palace. Its walls are made of milk and fruits. The thorana for the main door is made of vade and jilebis. Inside, the porticos are made of halwas. The entire roof is covered with rottis. In every room there are tanks filled with steaming hot kheer, cream of milk, coconut milk, draksharasa (grape juice) and so on. Not just that, mounds of chitranna (lemon rice) are piled around these tanks...’ Sabhapati continued to describe this food paradise. As he narrated, he would hold out a piece of the royal food, as if he intended to feed the King. He would bring the food close the King’s open mouth, and withdraw it suddenly.

The pishachi inside the King could not take this taunting and teasing any longer. Frustrated, it sprang out of the King’s mouth and tried to snatch the food from Sabhapati’s hand. But shrewd Sabhapati was quicker – he caught hold of the pishachi and thrust it in the fire heating up the kitchen stoves. That was the end of that mischievous, hungry ghost!
The King fainted as soon as the pishachi emerged from his belly. When he recovered the next day, he felt light and lively. His normal appetite had returned, and he was no longer tormented by hunger.

He rewarded Sabhapati with enormous riches and everyone lived happily ever after.

                                                  ********************************

Translation © Sumana Khan - 2016



Aarushi - Avirook Sen: Book Review

$
0
0
I picked up this book only after I got to know it was non-fiction: a journalistic account of the Aarushi case. Even so, I began reading with some trepidation; after all there were many a$$holes (pardon my samskruta) who had pulled out opinions from their backsides and presented it all as “facts”.  Thankfully, Avirook Sen, the author, categorically states that he presents no answers; he’s not written this book with the intent of solving the crime, or in order to dish out theories. He simply presents the case facts to which he’s had first-hand access: notes from the trial, post-mortem reports, forensic lab reports,  legal evidence presented both by the prosecution and defence, and interviews he’s conducted with various stakeholders of the case.

Having said that, the book is not some kind of a case diary, coldly and chronologically listing dates and events. Sen balances reportage and emotional content, without overdoing either. Not all readers agree though. Some have harshly criticised Sen for losing his neutral perspective and coming across as pro-Talwars. I don’t blame him – as the book progresses, the harsher details of the “investigation” conducted (for want of a better verb) both by the CBI and the police beggars belief.  If you are looking for examples of epic clusterfucks, this is it. I wouldn’t term it as being pro-Talwars, in so much as being gobsmacked at the sheer vindictiveness and collapse of the system.

A quick recap – Fourteen year old Aarushi Talwar was found dead in her room on the morning of May 16th, 2008. She had two savage wounds – a blow to her skull and a slit across her throat. The first post-mortem report ruled out sexual violence, and the injury to her head was pinned as the cause of her death. The injury to the throat was inflicted after her death. The initial suspect was Hemraj, the Talwars’ domestic help. However, his body was discovered on May 17th, on the terrace of Talwars’ home. His wounds were identical to that of Aarushi’s.

Sen has cleverly blended standard-issue fiction narrative style into a non-fiction account, elevating the pitch of the book from a mere repository of facts to something with emotional resonance. He carefully narrates details of the places he visits and gives engaging character sketches of the person he’s speaking with – mannerisms, location, language. He has been criticised for this “flaw” too, and some reviews have chastised his obsession with accents. For example, describing his meeting with Dr Mohapatra, a CFSL scientist and a prosecution witness for the CBI, Sen goes on to recount –
“At lunchtime one day I found Mohapatra sitting unaccompanied in the courtroom, minding two large folders on a table in front. He was a short, spectacled man, with a thick Odiya accent that sometimes confused people from the north (‘blood’, for instance, would become ‘blawed’).”

The point is, there are so many people involved in this case, and each one of them, be it a witness, an investigator or a lawyer, have contributed in their own way to this train-wreck. Sure, Sen could have simply listed out the names, but that will not engage the reader. These brief character sketches help us connect better with the flow of events and the people involved.

The book is unpalatable in that it exposes the ground reality of our judicial and investigative systems. Sen, like a blood hound, ferrets out nuggets of information that have never been revealed before. For example, the first investigating officer in this case, Sub Inspector Dattaram Nanoria was himself a convict in a custodial death case. He had served time in prison and was out on bail. Similarly, Sub Inspector Bachu Singh, who wrote the panchnamas for both the murders, was himself a murderer by then, having killed a woman in Mathura, his hometown.

Why are these details important? Because these highlight the cracks...craters rather...in our system. What sort of integrity can one expect when the investigating officer himself is a convict? What sort of sensitivity can one expect from a murderer? No wonder, this callousness is reflected all through the case. For someone who has already murdered a woman, what difference does it make to see another dead girl?

It also brings out the despicable working conditions of the police, especially in homicide cases. They have no sanitised protection from the scene itself.  When Hemraj’s body was finally discovered 36 hours after his death, it had swollen beyond recognition, the 47 degree summer heat accelerating the putrefaction. Bodybags are for movies. Four cops took a bedsheet from the Talwars, heaved the oozing, rotting corpse into it, and had to carry it to downstairs. How does one find motivation when working conditions are so...pardon this poor pun...rotten?

If the crime itself was chilling, the progress of the case is far more frightening.  Sen’s immaculate documentation demonstrates how the whole case was constructed based on misogynistic  and class biases, and the entire system bought this charade. If Aarushi had been a boy, the sex angle would not have figured this prominently; the investigation would have taken a different turn.  The sexualisation of this case would not have reached depraved depths had Nupur Talwar fitted into the mould of a weeping Nirupa Roy, the yesteryear actress who played the quintessential Indian Ma roles. Yes, if Nupur had beaten her chest and wailed and fainted, then everyone would be convinced that she was a pavitra Ma. But she did not. Perhaps her so-called lack of emotion was simply tightly bottled up, boiling rage. Her only child had been brutally done to death. But the police and media made the child out to be a Lolita of sorts, without a shred of evidence.  Not just that, the Talwars were painted as debauched orgy participants, again without a shred of evidence. Indeed, the CBI prosecution decided, hey, if there is no hard evidence, then character assassination should do the trick. Sen reports that the CBI prosecutor, Saini, in his closing arguments in the court, narrated that after committing the murders, Rajesh Talwar consumed alcohol even as he cleaned up the crime scene (“DNA dhulta raha”). Once the cleaning was done, Rajesh and Nupur apparently watched porn for the rest of the night. Yes, you guessed it...all this narration without a shred of evidence. But here’s the other scary part - hard forensic evidence pointing to the actual perpetrators was completely ignored by the CBI. Oh. And there is this little detail of the judge writing out the judgement a month before the closing arguments – his retirement date was coming up and he had no time for deliberations. He wanted to retire with a big-bang case, and this was the ticket.

The theory of honour killing as a motive was pressed into service almost immediately after the case broke out.  There was not a single aspect of the Talwars family life that supported this notion. Parents with this mindset will not put their daughters in co-ed schools. They will not give her mobile phones. They will not allow her to meet boys. Most definitely, they will not tolerate boys calling up the home phone asking for the daughter. Or worse, they will not tolerate boys sauntering in for a chat.  They will not allow her to wear certain type of clothes. They will not allow her to use social media. The list is endless – none of this holds water in the Talwars’ case. They come across as liberal, yet grounded parents, giving importance to the child’s education.  Even otherwise, going by “reports” that the Talwars were swingers...they’d be the last people to bother about honour, is it not?!

Sen’s book offers insights into the quagmire of judicial procedures in the context of the case, without getting too preachy or academic. It shatters idealistic notions of Satyameva Jayate. Sen puts it as, “The whole truth is a luxury. In case you are looking for it, a courtroom isn’t the place either to start or end the search.” As he reports the trial, I’ve laughed out loud several times, and immediately sobered up. I had to keep reminding myself, “This is not fiction. This is not fiction.” The ridiculous answers given by so-called expert witnesses, the silence of the court in accepting these answers – it is simply mind-boggling.

At least in my case, the book left me listless. For one, there is a sick feeling in the stomach that this has gone beyond perversion of justice. Secondly, with whatever little academic exposure I’ve had to forensic psychology, I can opine that these were execution type killings, and not a crime of passion. In the latter case, there’d be multiple stab wounds, or more blunt force trauma. There’d be defence wounds on the victim. Clean cutthroat wounds are more often than not inflicted from behind, that is, the perpetrator is positioned behind the victim; there is physical contact in order to hold the victim in position to expose the throat. A good forensic pathologist, by examining the wound, can determine the point of origin, and therefore, draw an inference on the handedness of the perpetrator (right-handed or left-handed); the probable weapon used; the position of the perpetrator with respect to the victim and so on. Also, since two different weapons were used, and there was more than one victim, one wonders if the crime was premeditated. I believe there was more to the mid-night meeting between Hemraj and the killers. If this had been probed following the incriminating forensic evidence, I believe the real motive for the murders would have surfaced.

One thing is certain – this is not the first crime, nor will it be the last perpetrated by the killer. The system handed him freedom on a platter.


 © Sumana Khan - 2016

Time, Slow Down!

$
0
0
Courtesy: Clipart
Every time I return to my blog, it’s like homecoming. I unlock the doors, open the windows, do some dusting and think Damn! It’s good to be back. It’s just been an extended break of scurrying around getting certain things on track. But here’s all the stuff I’ve been writing when I was away –

Some guest posts for my book, Encounters. You can read them here –

Here’s an interview on my writing process.

Here’s a short story for Encounters promo.

I was asked to write about my inspiration behind Encounters. You can read them here and here

I’ve also been coaxed to do more marketing for my books. So now, you can find me tongue-tied on twitter. My handle is @SumanaSKhan. I think.

With all this, I realise it’s already June. Half the year is gone and I keep wondering where was I? It’s scary the way time is galloping away at breakneck speed. It’s not that I’m doing anything terribly exciting to feel this way – I’m mostly as sedate as a grazing cow – but where is time running away? Wasn’t it just yesterday when my year-old niece was trying to bite my ear? Now she speaks to me over the phone - ‘Why are you crrrrazy?’ Eh? When did she grow up so fast and start asking pertinent questions? Where was I when this was happening? When I first met him, a friend’s son was all excited about turning 12. Now, he’s suddenly talking about Economics and University. What the hell? 

I tell you, there is something wrong. A leak in the space-time continuum for sure. It’s a complicated relationship – space & time. If you are closer to an object with great mass, time slows down (you can read about it here). So the leak must be in my home. Great mass. Hmm. Lo and behold The Husband. KK was lounging around, playing online chess on his iPad. Is it any wonder that time is not working under this roof? Yeah okay, between the two of us, our mass is quite significant. I suspect we have our own gravitational fields. This theory was somehow stolen by Seth McFarlane for Family Guy.  


‘Hello’, I snap my fingers at KK. ‘Have you noticed something strange?’ It’s a rhetorical question because KK wouldn’t notice even if a polar bear sat at the dining table and grunted at him to pass the salt.

I can see that the question has slid over KK’s head.

‘Time. It’s going away too fast and yet, we are kind of still,’ I try to articulate.

He tries hard to say something meaningful. Finally settles for a head bob. I enumerate examples to prove time is slipping away at breakneck speed and yet here we are. Poking at the iPad and wondering what day it is. It is true – neither of us can remember which day of the week has dawned, unless some terribly important event is scheduled for that day. KK’s frame of reference for an elapsed day is food – “The day we ate dimer torkari”, or “it has been X days since I had aloo posto”.  

I don’t even have any frame of reference. KK thinks that could be the problem. He postulates we could be on a Thursday, and I’d still be thinking it’s a Monday and bam! After all, just a few days ago, when we were filling up some forms, I thought I was a certain age, but it turned out I was two years older. I was sure KK was being rude...but he proved he was right through mathematical calculations; I verified these on the phone calculator, on my laptop calculator and the scientific calculator with the plastic flip-lid. I admit, there was a bit of a meltdown. How could I have lost track of two years...not that I had any milestones or goals. I mean there were days when I’d wake up thinking I’ll just head to Marakkech or board the Trans-Siberian Express...just to get new experiences. But those thoughts would perish soon after the coffee – packing, airports, beheadings – the hell. Then I’d think it’s perfectly okay to sit in one’s home and look at the magpies. But STILL...losing two years just like that...just staring out of the window? I voiced all this while stomping around the flat and the next thing I know, KK was scrambling for a flight to Peru. Last minute meeting apparently.

On a previous occasion, when I had freaked out about being just a collection of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen atoms...and so what the hell was earth-life all about...KK boarded a flight to Pune. Again, “meeting”. I can detect a pattern when I see one.

I had the same organic chemistry conversation with Appa over Skype. Mid-way, Appa looked out of the window and said a UFO just whizzed by, he was sure of it; no, it was not a firework because no rocket can go like that. I’ll give him the benefit of doubt because the next day, Deccan Herald did carry an article about alien sighting near Periyapatna.  That’s about 65-70kms away from Mysore...a few seconds for an alien spaceship I suppose. Or maybe it was just an uncanny coincidence. Appa must be like...that was a close call...that UFO passing by at the right time. 


But back to my time puzzle, I decided not to freak out. I spoke in measured terms about harnessing time. Well, time stood still for KK at least- he fell asleep on the iPad. 

Let me know if you also are facing the same time problem. It's a conspiracy I tell you...

© Sumana Khan - 2016

A Cinderella Evening

$
0
0
I came across an unusual writing competition earlier this year, in a magazine that I subscribe to – the UK-based Writing Magazine. WM was teaming up with JustWrite team (John Murray Press) for a short story competition. I am not very skilled at short stories;  IMO it requires tremendous skill and  I find it very daunting, actually. But this competition was different; first of all, the reward was unique: six shortlisted winners would get to meet folks from publishing and the winner would get a detailed critique of his/her work. What better prize could a writer get? Secondly, the word count was very generous at 8000 words. I decided to go for this and as usual I did not get around to developing a story till the very last minute.

The last day of the submission dawned and I sat down for a 12-hour writing marathon. It was a bank holiday Monday. The deadline was midnight. I completed the story at about 10 in the night. I had just two hours for editing and it was simply not enough. I shot past the deadline by a good 15 minutes. Surely, my entry would not be considered now? I closed my laptop utterly dejected. Thankfully, thankfully I changed my mind – I thought I had nothing to lose by sending it out, even if I’m late...even if I knew all the flaws in the writing...and I emailed the story. 

Weeks later, when I got an email from the editor of Writing Magazine, Jonathan Telfer, informing me that I’d been shortlisted, I simply could not believe it. I read and re-read the email. Maybe it was spam? Maybe they had made a mistake? Such was my disbelief that I waited for the dreaded email that confirmed it was all a mistake, and I must be “disqualified”. No such calamity occurred – I was chuffed to see myself on the September issue of Writing Magazine, along with five other shortlisted writers. The shortlisted winners were invited for the promised party on August 18th evening at Hodder & Stoughton office in London.

Come August 18th, I admit, the disbelief stayed with me even as I boarded the train to Paddington, rode the tube and stood before the venue—one of those quintessential London buildings, bang opposite Blackfriars Pier on the Thames.  Hodder & Stoughton is on the fifth floor, where I met my fellow shortlists – Dan Purdue, Emma Myatt, Ian Laskey, LouiseHare, and Sally Jenkins - what a delight that was!  Such diverse backgrounds – all united by a passion to write.  We spent a leisurely couple of hours chatting over coffee, posing for photographs, and browsing through the amazing display shelves stacked with all the new releases from H&S. 

L-R: Emma, Yours truly, Dan, Louise, Sally, Ian and Jonathan Shipley of JW.

We were all given a bulging goodies bag – books and gift vouchers – a true Santa’s sack!




Each of us was whisked away for a short video interview in what is probably the most beautiful room I’ve ever stepped into. Nestled in a corner away from view, the Darwin room is a capsule of silence, lined with books, furnished with plush armchairs and settees, with windows overlooking the road and river below.  If ever the Room of Requirement came true for me, it would certainly look like this!

We all then trooped to the H&S rooftop terrace garden – the venue of the party. London’s steel and glass skyline twinkled and shimmered in the evening sun. Below, passenger ferries churned the dirty brown Thames with white foam ever so often.   The traffic noise was muted but relentless.  There have been a few moments in my life when I’ve thought,  ‘Am I really here?’ – this was one of those moments! 




The winner’s name was announced in true movie award style (congratulations to Emma). The biggest surprise came when our books were revealed – they’d put together our short stories in slim paperbacks with a beautiful cover (Emma got a hardbound copy :)) – to be freely distributed.   We had a great time autographing the copies! You can read all the stories here :)




For me, the most amazing part of the evening was meeting so many different people connected with books – be it authors, publishers, editors or literary consultants. Everyone was so kind and generous in sharing their experiences, listening to our writing processes and they were genuinely interested in our journey as writers.  Iain Campbell, the publisher director at H&S; the team from the literary consultancy Cornerstones – Helen, Rebecca, Alex;  the WM and JW teams including both the Jonathans, Jan, Lauren and so many others made the evening even more special for us. 

I came away feeling like Cinderella – only I did not have any midnight deadline! As a writer still struggling to find a foothold; as a writer with a very limited exposure, it was with much trepidation that I entered this competition. What I got in return has been far beyond my expectation - I feel fortunate and humbled and buoyed that my writing can find a readership outside India.

My only regret – I should have eaten the spectacular cupcakes.


© Sumana Khan - 2016
Viewing all 126 articles
Browse latest View live